Writing Advice from WritersAdvice on writing from writers
Writing Arts & Crafts:
Twenty inspiring tips for writers on National Writing Day
There are a number of UK-wide activities for this event, which can be found on the National Writing Day website. I' ve got some advice for authors: Describe something you care about. You' re reading a lot for fun. Can' t handle poor writing, can' t handle anything.
It has to be re-written if it has to be reread twice. You just tell your own tale.
Memorized: One year in writing consulting
Sweet Lamb of Heaven writer Lydia Millet used Dr. Seuss' classical work The Lorax to advocate a kind of notion that is explicitly politicized - tales and fictions that deal directly with the most urgent questions of the mornings. She debated how to spell with ethical authorities without becoming preaching: "I hardly ever publish a work in which I don't try to get close to an concept or a series of concepts that I think are of interest for the point of culture.....
Fictitiously tackling these notions, I had to struggle on the technological side with the tricky task of reconciling the aesthetic of modern writing (grounded in subjectivity and disinclined towards the didactical, the private and generally hostile) with what one might call an unmodern ethical perspective.
When I am turned away from the text and turn away from something that should be interpreted in philosophy, it is a good indication that someone else feels the same way. The most persuasive philosophic, politic or spiritual idea in a fictional sense is when it is created from an organic figure.
The only way I can make a character is the sound, the texturing of the character within a story. I feel that the fight to be good at writing is also the fight to be honest at writing, even when they seem to be in conflict. This is not only for children's literature, but for every work.
The authors of this year proposed that their work requires something different: open-mindedness, ductility of thought, the capacity to maintain and assess several points of views. A Doubter's Almanac writer, Mayin, described how writing is a self-interrogation procedure, a way of withdrawing from what you are most confident about.
I' ve seen many college kids come up and say I want to start a novel about blah bla bla bla bla. All you can do is create a novel about a person who does something bad and see what happens from there. So if you are writing a play of fantasy, I would strongly ask you not to show anything - instead of discovering something.
There is no way to create something mighty unless your subconscious assumes responsibility. You must free yourself from your grand aims, your aspirations, your ideas regarding humanness, writing and philosophies by concentrating on the otherness that is liberating, enchanting and one of the few true pleasures of writing.
Quit fretting about writing a big novel - just become a different person. Michael Chabon, the Moonglow writer, talked in detail about Borges' great novel "The Aleph" - the whole procedure of choosing the right words from a plethora of possible decisions. To write a persuasive personality is an act that demands a kind of extreme empathy: I think the right approach to your people.
It is a much more self-controlling compassion where you see and grasp the human tragedy and routines, the way their personalities miss the goals they themselves have been setting - just as you miss the goals you have been setting for yourself. "Tony Tulathimutte, the writer of Private Citizens, stated in an essay that he could only finish his first novel when he became more truthful about his own atrocities:":
With as much loving, empathetic, hopeful and imaginative writing as hatred, malice, worry and complacency. So that'?s how the script was made. I' m not saying that unappetizing figures make for good writing by default; it's just as simple to go the other way and make Bret Easton Ellis/Chuck Palahniuk shade dolls (dark, shallow, stupid).
I say that trying to compose your character so that they don't make a comparison with you, and even more badly, to call this empiricism, means losing the sincerity that the reader deserves instead of the truths. A Gambler's Anatomy writer Jonathan Lethem made a similar point: "In fairy tales, you can't ignore the hardest parts of yourself.
Don't protect yourself from unease and modesty; watch out for these feelings, because they probably tell you something important: The impetus to make the ceremony secure, to bring into the game character that are finally adorable and redeemable, is extremly dull and also suspicious.
It' a little like writing a script that way. The Pier Falls writer Mark Haddon showed what novel writers can tell us about living in discomfort: For me, the writing task is quite a climb most of the while. It' like ascending a hill - you get amazing vistas when you are paused or when you come up, but the real trial can be difficult.
I am sure there are those who like to write and I wish them well, but I am not. Wish I could really appreciate the trial more, but I think I accepted that I had to feel uneasy for it to work. Alice & Oliver writer Charles Bock unveiled his favourite technique:
I' m going to go for ten mins and I' m not sure if I'm falling sleepy or not, but I' m sitting there and I' m just sizing up. The writer of The Queen of the Night, Alexander Chee, made a similar point about what you enjoy. One of the great writing teachers cautioned him against writing about fictional fies.
We interviewed him arguing for the use of fictional partyscenes, even if they seem superficial and difficult to write: Because of the quality that makes partying a bad dream for humans - and also so pleasant - it is unbelievably important in myth. Challenge traditional sage and do not follow the advice of authorities at face value.