Writing a Biography BookWrite a biography book
So, how will they hear from you?
Writing a good biography
Only the best bios are rewritten for new purposes. One biography is aimed at informing, captivating, enraging, inspiring or all this. You give us a comprehensive view of the world of a distinguished individual. Some of the hardest bios are unfounded. Plutarch's Parallel Live was one of the first photographed portraits to adorn the site.
Composed in the first century by the Charles Dickens of ancient Greece, the book was a compendium of the lives and eras of illustrious men (Julius Caesar, Alexander the Great and Coriolanus, to name but a few) - and is, as one might say, a best-seller of the age. It was he who made the difference between biography and simple ancient historiography and realized that what makes a narrative interesting is not the facts or happenings, but the emotions and motivation of the individuals in it.
This is because it gives the readers an insight into what is happening, reduces the distance between readers and topics and allows us to comprehend them on a more individual scale. So, what does this have to do with your creepy biography concept? Now, while you may have an image of who you want to talk about, it's also important to take Tom's advise from your own lives, from your own history, and to think about why you want to talk about them.
Consider: What makes your topic interesting? How is it about your topic that a readership wants to know (what they don't already know)? So how can you bring history to life? When they are living, then your best shot is, and your main research instrument, to interrogate the topic, your families, your boyfriends and anyone else who can have a singular view of the being.
Tough journalism: With strongly prepaired, concrete responses to a particular topic. A gentle approach to journalism: With prearranged but open ended quizzes that allow the respondent to move in the desired directions. Conversation method: an open back and forth, in which the respondent leads the debate in the hopes of uncovering something extraordinary or unforeseen.
Every approach has its advantages and disadvantages, so that you can choose how best to obtain information from your interviewer. If, for example, you are gathering information or trying to see your topic as a personality, a gentle journalism or conversation technique would probably work best.
If, on the other hand, you are trying to extract concise quotations or accurate information, the tough editorial approach is the right one. You will need to accumulate a plethora of primaries and secondaries if you want your biography to have any credentials, so beat the ledgers, browse the web and speak to information professionals.
When your topic was alive a long time ago, then you are studying what it was like back then. Which were the views and views of the persons around your topic? What could have influenced her Iife? They never know what you might find during your research, what you might be learning that will destroy your prejudices about the topic.
In essence, what you are trying to summarize is a whole lifetime in the shape of a book; an interesting book. It' a book someone wants to see in their free timeframe. Let us be clear: living and writing are not the same thing. There is no shape, no texture to live and it is totally different from a book.
"One bloody thing after another is the other. "So how do you make your marks in your history? What is the best way to make a nice tale of your own personal history to tell and tell? So the task of the autographer is to form and consolidate a person's world into a structure.
That means concentrating on the pertinent parts of the subject's live, selecting the parts that they have evolved as a human being, and putting everything into a story telling state. Do you have a one-of-a-kind theoretical background on your topic? The writing of a book should be done in 3 steps: There may be several designs and edits to create the biography of your dream, but continue until you are satisfied.