Writer of the BookAuthor of the book
Dealings in being a writer, Friedman
Authors speak about their work in many ways: as arts, as vocation, as way of life. All too often these discussions lack the fact that letter is also a deal. As a matter of fact, those who want to make a full-time or part-time posting will have a more rewarding and prolific careers if they are able to grasp the fundamental trade principals that underlie the sector.
It is a great way to get the best possible support for your writing. The businesses of being a writer provides the training writer need, but so rare. It' intended for young authors who want to create realism in their work or for authors who want a better knowledge of the game. Authors get a complete view of how the publishers work - from inquiries and agencies to blogs and advertisements - and how they can best market themselves for long-term results.
It encourages without icing by combining years of research with hands-on advices that help authors promote themselves and maximise their writing-related incomes.
And who really did write Job's book?
Job's is probably the oddest scripture in the Hebrew Bible and is known to be hard to date. It begins with God and Satan talking about Job, a "perfect and upright" man who "feared God and avoided evil" (1:1). God Satan says that Job is virtue only because he is wealthy; if he suffers, he would certainly "curse" you (1:11).
He takes up the temptation and gives Satan leave to ruin Job's ordeal. When Satan murders his kids, ruins his home and gives him a horrible sickness. Bible scientists assume that it is a later supplement to the volume, especially because the first three of Elihu's buddies are listed in the introductory section, but Elihu emerges out of nowhere.
Again many scientists believe that this part was not in the source textbook, but was added by a later publisher, because it seems strangely out of place. At the end of the story, Job's fortune is recovered and he gets a new family.
Talmud (Bava Barta 14b) says it was spelled by Moses, but on the next page (15a) Rabbi Jonathan and Eliezer say that Job was among those who exiled from Babylon in 538 B.C., which was about seven hundred years after Moses' alleged deaths. On the same side of the Talmud it is suggested that Job is not a true figure and that the whole text is only an apostolate.
They have no historical references, but they can analyse the languages and the theologies and contrast them with other Hebrew scriptures of known origin. Job's speech is different from any other in the Bible or outside it. Although the script is in Hebrew, it is indeed very weird.
There are more singular words than any other Hebrew Bible work. It is an old Aramaic tongue, which would mean that it is very old: but it is also strongly affected by Aramaic, which would make it relatively new. Odd linguistic theory ranges from Arabic Jews to a bad Aramaic or Idumean text, the biblical Edom of which we have no records - but would probably have been very similar to Hebrew (note that Job is called Idumean rather than Judean).
Now the most common theorem is that Job was spelled by someone whose first tongue was Aramaic, but whose literature tongue was Hebrew, and that the use of the ancient tongue was intentional. That would indicate that we are speaking about an writer or more likely writers who live in the early phase of the Second Temple.
The more meaningful are the religions in the textbook in which Satan is portrayed as a member of God's counsel. Satan is not referred to in pre-Exilical Bible textbooks. That alone would mean that the script was composed after Babylon's exile. But Satan is not presented as the almighty power of the bad, as he is in the annals.
Since chronicles were probably chronicled in the fourth millennium B.C., Job would have been inscribed before. Job's Satan, if anything, is most similar to the Satan of the book of Zachariah in the early phase of the Second Temple, which may indicate that Job was spelled in the same phase - the sixth cent.
Also in the Books of Job there is no reference to rewards and punishments in the Hereafter. Now this backs up the scripture again to the aboriginal point Temple discharge, as the institution in the aftlife clearly for the point case appearance in the text of Daniel, in a writing fabric to person been backhand in the point area.
It is beyond doubt that the volume was already published in the second millennium BC, since an Aramaic version of the volume Job was found among the Dead Sea scrolls. Although the history of Job was recorded in the early period of the Second Temple (late sixth to early fourth centuries B.C.), this does not mean that the history was new.
He mentioned Job together with Noah and Daniel as men of old reputation (Ezekiel 14:14). That means that for Ezekiel Job was one of those legendary figures about whom tales were narrated throughout the Middle East, and not particularly Judaic, just as a Noah-like tale in the epic of Gilgamesh is published, and a mythic Daniel from the old Sami town of Ugarit is known.
Indeed, archeologists have discovered several writings about deities from the old Middle East that punish a fully upstanding man: in some ways they could be like Job or even the source of history. In the very socio-political Aramaic era - sometime between 550 and 350 BC - a Jew who lived from Egypt to Palestine and Babylonia, whose native language was Aramaic, probably took one of these verbal myths and composed it in Hebrew.
We can' t know exactly who he was, but considering that he had written a novel, he was probably a writer.