What Qualifications do I need to be an Author

Which qualifications do I need to be an author?

Authors and writers select the material they want to use and then pass the information on to readers. Furthermore, the authors should define the authority of their claims and arguments. But if not, you may have to keep looking! Remember the essays you wrote in school and do the same.

Motifs and Qualification

Being a good discriminating readership, it is important to consider the motivation and qualification of the writers. Writers usually try to persuade the editor that their point of views are the right one. In reviewing a text, the user should verify that: 2 ) the facts provided have been selected from a wider range of facts or figures and restricted to those that endorse the author's views or biases.

3 ) The facts presented investigate different prospects than those of the writer and investigate different views and sides that can be taken in terms of the subject or the argumenta. 4 ) the facts substantiating the facts refer to the point raised and demonstrate or endorse the author's views, reasons or inferences. Irrespective of the author's opinion and intent, proof should be provided to substantiate claims and inferences, and the source of such proof should be quoted so that the reader can verify and evaluate the correctness of the facts for himself.

If you read in a critical way, the reader must pay attention to the many points of views that refer to a subject or theme and look for them if the writer does not recognize them. Furthermore, the writers should define the authoritative nature of their assertions and argument. When not, the reader! Ask the authors' authorities!

Can the" mouth of the horse" and the writer be identified and authentic? Binding? It is the reader's responsibility to verify the authors' qualification, purpose and authorities. For example, if the writer of an essay on the subject of prostitution is a practising doctor, the book should ask discerning as:: Do physicians' education and experience in this field give them legitimacy as an authoritarian in this field?

So why is the writer doing this story? Did the writer give an overview of the research or research project carried out to gather proof to support the presented view? Does the writer attempt to affect readers' attitudes, judgements and activities? They are cautious when making a decision about an approach indicated or encouraged by an editor.

Do you use the following criterions and question as starting point for the evaluation of the "horse's mouth" Is the item clearly identifiable? Do testimonies, distinctions and other works by the same writer appear to prove the authoritative nature behind the allegations and trustworthiness of the information presented? Provides the writer with resources for proof and indicates where recognition is due?

Links or resources should be quoted to help in identifying information resources used to substantiate argument and claim. The quotes give the authors due recognition and advice for further investigations and research. Referrals allow the reader to review and assess the source and get an idea of the topics for themselves.

When works are quoted, what are they? Is it a second source for abstracts and analysis of originals, research and reporting? Will it be primarily source material such as genuine and genuine text, first-hand documentary evidence or eye-witness and research work? Identifies and provides resources for comparative and more comprehensive information to confirm and support claim?

Is there a resource for complete reporting on the subject? Which is the date of the last reprimand or the last quoted resource for proof supporting allegations? Do you have the latest, most up-to-date and precise information on the subject? But if not, you may have to keep looking!

Knowledges change quickly, especially when it comes to healthcare and medicine or sciences and technologies that require a critical assessment of the precision of information. You can use the above mentioned criterions and queries to assess the authoritative and accurate nature of these two AIDS-papers. Who of these writers proves trustworthiness and authoritarianism and the correctness of his information?

This stands for thinkin' to provide more information and advice on how to evaluate the motivation and believability of writers, especially those who post on the web. If you are looking for a true adventure and some enjoyment, have a look at the Ig Nobel Prizes "Home Page" and guess through the following question: e.g: Who' s the creator of this page?

Which are the author's goals? Look at a few. If we know what to look for and how to assess the authenticity of these writers, our own informative attitude as reader, thinker, decision-maker is strengthened and enriched by different writers with different points of view. ASK MOTIVES AND AUTHORITY!

Mehr zum Thema