What are the different Types of NonfictionWhich are the different types of non-fiction books?
KINDS OF NON-FICTION TEXTBOOKS IN CHILDREN'S LITERATURE
While there are many more non-fiction titles in the grown-up literary community than in the children's community, non-fiction is still warm (and probably always will be)! And, since textbooks are a kind and not a category, each of the types of textbooks mentioned here would be an example of a non-fiction or subgenre, if you like.
All sorts of non-fiction exists for kids who wait to be researched andritten. These are the most popular types of non-fiction in children's writing. Typical for younger audiences, such as pre-schoolers. Those ledgers contain subjects like scoring, the script, contrasts, colours, weekdays and more.
There are plenty of gamebooks. There' s always a store for more illustrated gamebooks. You can talk about lifecycles, compare/contrast, a whole days in the lives of, living space, or anything related to educating youngsters about pets. They like to do all sorts of things and want to do more.
They could be how to make and cook textbooks, how to make certain toys, how to build a library, how to become an enterpreneur, everything! Bios for kids are just about to explode. Jeanne Walker Harvey's True Tales and a Cherry on Top is all about pictures.
Childrens textbooks about historic or recent happenings make up this category of children's literature. This can be a book about wars, politics, society, etc. It' not really about a certain individual, but about what really is. Often a biography is historic because a single individual usually had a great influence on what was happening.
Everything else kids want to know, go here.
I' ve been reading three kinds of non-fiction book.
Recently I realised that if I wanted to study on a theme, I wanted to divide the available literature into three different groups. While this is the most useful kind of work for me to study on a particular theme, for most subjects there is no such work. There are many fundamental texts on the "hard" disciplines (e.g. "sedentary" mathematics and chemistry) and the "formal" disciplines (e.g. "sedentary" mathematics, statistic and computer science).
I know of very few intellectually honest and epistemologically rigorous works in the soft arts (including for example history) that (for me) alone are persuasive. The only example that comes to my head when I am writing this is David Roodman's microfinancing due diligence work. They are a good case of the fact that the information they present was gathered and presented in a fairly rational way, and I find it useful to know what the source information is, but when the text tries to convince me of non-obvious underlying assumptions, I find the text informative but inconclusive.
After all, my third class of non-fiction is "food for thought. Apart from not being convinced of non-obvious reasoning, these ledgers cannot prove that the information that underpins their argument has been gathered and presented in a rational manner. What I get from them is just a fundamental vocabulary and some hypothesis and argument and story I didn't know about before.
I suspect that I am more sceptical than most serious non-fiction reader, even most scholars.