Speed Reading AppVelocity Reading App
Speedreading Apps: Can you really reread a novel during your midday break? technique
It would take a little over six and a half hours on our website if you could finish reading it without being diverted by your e-mail or your dogs or kids or the content of the refrigerator or the invoices you have to cover. What if you were able to absorb all its (undoubtedly) nuances and wealth in half this while?
Evelyn Wood, an US teacher, whose quick-reading approach to improving the life of young people in Salt Lake County, Utah, by educating them to easily learn to literate, gave her the feeling that she could literate at a speed of 2,700 words per second, 10x quicker than the general literate mind.
In the 50s and 1960s, Wood opened her Reading Dynamics Institute in the USA and beyond with Doug, her husbands, and her methodologies became a self-help mania. She explained the way in which we were reading, in the mind of guiding the instant, was ineffective in relation to space and movement.
In order to do this, Wood encouraged the technology of moving a digit to the center of a page to "activate peripherical vision". At the end of a course in Reading Dynamics, the out of breath pupils "read" Orwell's Animal Farm at a speed of 1,400 words per min and told stories of revolutions.
Kennedy, who considered himself a quick and talented readers (and whose counterparts "read" the New York Times and the Washington Post every 10 mornings, scan and turn the pages), sent a doze of his co-workers to the Evelyn Wood Reading Dynamics Institute in Washington.
However, the scientific aspects of Wood's approach were never even proved, and when she died in 1995, her notions had gone out of style. Recently, the fast-reading rides have been revitalized and encouraged for several purposes. First is the convincing awareness that we live in an age of information flooding, that we are confronted with more words every day than we can possibly handle, and that new strategies are needed so that we can understand everything.
âThese dual sensations have resulted in a surge of business and applications aimed once again at "revolutionizing" your reading speed (at the expense of $4. 99 or whatever, a month). They do this at speeds of 300 or 500 or 1,000 words per second, so you can "read" texts and lexica.
At 800wpm I found out that I could only record three words from Animal Farm for meaning, but that I not only had a light sensation of fear when I tried to keep up, I was losing any feel for the rythm of the speech and with it the sound of what was said.
The injection molding technique invented by a Boston-based business is built on the notion that much of the reading "wasted" amount of space is consumed in a fraction of a second as the eyes shift between words and across the page. Using this technique I found that I could just reread about easy sections for direction at 700wpm, a skill I envision would become more naturally, if not necessarily more convenient, the longer you practiced it.
As Evelyn Wood is used to, in most cases you begin with an evaluation of your present (bad) reading habit. It is in the essence of my work as a reporter that I often record a great deal of information under deadline pressures, so I think - no doubt along with just about everyone else - that I have gained quite a quick understanding.
One app named Acceleread was slightly amazed at my capability to browse a paragraph about deep-sea beings and then respond to a range of question. Prior to starting on this bodybuilding course for my eye and my mind, I am reading through some of the pretty complicated sciences of reading (generally no more than 200Wpm, and with many distractions).
Much study has been done on the allegations of rapid reading classes based on Evelyn Wood's early promise. They are definitely a big research study, "So much to study, so little time: How do we study, and can reading help? Reading has only recently become fully understand.
In this case, the human eyes move either further forward or backward briefly and unconsciously to affirm the meaning of what has been reading so far. However, all tests indicated that a shortcircuit in this procedure resulted in a lack of understanding and retentivity. What the mastermind of ordinary reading is that it can change these split seconds very precisely, according to how much of the meaning of what is actually reading has been captured.
Fixed sentences and saccadas are adapted accordingly in a tight proposition, with subordinate sentences and unknown speech, so that there is no rupture in the reading stream. Approximately 30% of the period, the sacade will shrink vocabulary and skip those it can forecast. There are three factors that tend to determine the expected acceleration: the sub-vocalization, the backward loop and the difference in words.
The" So Little Time" survey studied each one in turn. There was a steep drop in understanding when researchers tried to get humans to remove words that sounded subconsciously in their minds, for example by making them growl while reading. Both of these procedures worked smoothly, the speed shifted them. You may find the issue with the second pledge more evident - you don't have to use the app for very long to realize that without the capability to read a word or a sentence again, you can quickly loose the plot of what you've said.
The kind of reading is one of the things on which the study does not focus too much. While I can't think of ever wanting to see a novel with more than the usual 300 wpm (in contrast, a spoken part is about 150 wpm - and even stock sellers can only ratble at 250 wpm), the virtues of reading brief posts or e-mails on RSDP at twice the speed seem more reasonable.
However, there is a possibility that most of us already use different kinds of intuitively designed scimming technique to retrieve information from such files when there is a shortage of information. That' s why JFK could "read" the New York Times so quickly - he probably "knew" most tales first-hand anyway and only looked at front page news and first-phrases.
In 1985, Ronald Carver, University of Missouri Teacher of Pedagogy and Sociology, in a groundbreaking research on "Brainiacs", showed that the attempt to literate more than 600 words per min. led to the understanding of each text falling below 75% and declining drastically as reading speed improved.