Science Publishingscholarly publisher
Made from the Mediterranean Bergnamot Oranges trees, this ethereal bergamot essence has more than just a aromatic flowery flavour, making it one of the most widely used fragrance and aromatic therapy products. Much more than just a seasoning with a lukewarm, Musky fragrance, the ethereal oils of African peppers offer a multitude of advantages for your good looks and goodness.
That' s mainly because of his ©2014 Life Science Publishing.
That 1% of scholarly publishing is science.
Publication is one of the most celebrated milestones in a career in science, and every scientist hated having a hole in that part of his or her resume. In a new survey, very few researchers - less than 1% - release a work each year. However, these 150,608 researchers predominate the research magazines and have their name on 41% of all works.
One of the most quoted works is this group of elites among the co-authors of 87% of the works. This new study, released in PLOS ONE on July 9, was conducted by John Ioannidis, an expert in epidemiology at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, and analyzed by Kevin Boyack and Richard Klavans of SciTech Strategies.
Between 1996 and 2011, 15 million researchers from all over the world presented their work in many different fields. "I chose to investigate this issue because I had seen a large number of gifted individuals in my lifetime who simply could not live in the present system and with the currently scarce resources," Ioannidis sent an email to ScienceInsider.
It presumed that few researchers were able to post articles year after year. There is a dramatic reduction in the number of researchers who have always released more than one a year. Most of these productive researchers are probably the leaders of labs or research groups; they contribute funds, monitor research and include their name in the many documents that arise.
Ioannidis says that others may be researchers who have enough safety and enough research experience. When he could choose one thing, Ioannidis said in an email, he would suggest disseminating funds "to give a larger community of researchers, especially younger ones, more possibilities to help them ensure the continuation of productive and excellent work".