Pattern of Story WritingSample of story writing
Well-established patterns of narrative structure
There is a uniquely descriptive cipher to the kinds of conflicts within a particular tale, similar to the DNA's own genomic cipher. Just as another genome mix defines the ultimate man for whom they are accountable, the mix of these dramatically powerful narratives is what makes up the individual.
Why do some tales seem to have the same person? Previously in this Conflicts section, we examined the four main areas of troubled conflicts as sketched in the dramatica theories of history. Be it a situation, an action, a way of thought or a firm attitude, a dilemma must find a home somewhere in this diagram.
Furthermore, we found that a winning writer adds the four great throughhlines to these areas to efficiently address the full extent of what they are trying to say with their stories. The main character, influential character, relationship history and overall history. There are four throughhlines, four general areas of war.
Place a continuous line in each area and the history will completely touch. Bring them in a similar patterns to other tales and the tales themselves start to perceptibly familiarize themselves. Wherever an writer chooses to concentrate the conflicts in his history, the character of this history is defined. It is a favourite combo, especially in the West, which has the main character in a problematic situation, the influence character in a firm posture, the whole history in activity and the history of relationships in a thought process.
Probabilities are the predominant sex behind most occidental cinema (i.e., men) find it easier to put a dispute they don't comprehend ("thought processes") into a continuum that they generally don't get ("relationships"). Regardless of this, the above movies are following the same patterns. Their main character is mainly a foreigner in a foreign country or a foreigner outside the sea (problematic situation).
You will find a volitional indigenous man who is determined by what you believe (Problematic Fixed Attitude). It is this faith that compels the main character to rethink how they do things. Of course, the two are developing a relation that changes the way they see things (although they usually only focus on altering the thought process of the main character).
All of this happens against the background of wicked colonialists who consume and destroy a tranquil area. As more than a legend, these movies sharpens their laser with dramatically focussed on the same goals of conflicting. What if we were to concentrate not only on the description al similarities of settings and story-telling, those of the "white" colonialist in a foreign homeland, but instead direct our attentions to the kinds of conflicts within each line of passage.
Will the same conflicts be followed by other famous US movies of the West? This is the theme of the multi-year old Star Wars game. Skywalker finds a dispute in a problematic situation farmyard young on the far side of the Galaxie. In the genre table, Ben Kenobi, who is directly opposite him, is directly in charge of the motivation of Luke's own grown.
Old Obi Wan defined Fixed Attitude - his faith in life and his ability to change life shows no sign of fluctuation. Hiccup's reduction state ( "situation") found great opposition in his father's rigid attitude, as stated in the piece A Conflict Unlike Any Other. However, in contrast to Stoick in this poem about the Vikings, Ben's firm attitude in this spatial operatic is a definite one.
It is another example of how Dramatica rejects dictating the narrative style of a film. She suggests the narrative point's subject matter, but how it develops, whether positively or negatively, lies in the talents of the single writer (as it should be natural).
If you look at the other two throughlines, Star Wars still follows the same patterns. Their major storyline, or A storyline, revolves around problematic actions between the evil and the well-stealing schemes, the storms of expeditionary vessels, the firing of laser beams, the blasting of stars - all inter-stellar conflicts as they are determined by actions. On the other hand, there is the relationship between Lukas and Ben and the joint research of problematic thought processes.
Aside from Luke's problems with his whereabouts and Ben's stance towards power, the conflicts between them add the lack of critical element necessary to complement the narrative. Often, in the framework of a relation, this particular part of the genre diagram looks more like manipulations than ways of thought or processes of cognition.
From a technical point of view they all mean the same, but due to the fact that for many writers this is a problem area of the table (the male half of the above population), the short term helps to make sense. This manipulation defines the suspense in their relation and provides the last pillar that complements the study of inequality.
Like in the continuous comparisons between Avatar and Pocahontas, many compare the array to Star Wars? Neo finds a situation like Lukas - he is the one and does not want to be. And yet all under the roof of Activity. And, as with Luke and Ben, the Morpheus-Neo relation is one of manipulation ("Free your mind....").
The authors of The Matrix have not only recreated a series of "mythical" historical beat, but also recorded the precise areas of Star Wars conflicts. It is a favourite design that reaches into the animated realm of contemporary US animations. As Star Wars, The Matrix and How to Training Your Dragon, Kung Fu Panda is focusing its areas of conflicts on similar issues.
Po's situation? Shifu's posture? In contrast to Morpheus and Ben, this influential character strongly thinks that Po is NOT the one. Your relation? And, lastly, the whole story? The repetitive pattern of the genre explains why all these movies have a trusted sound. Irrespective of the topic, history investigates the same KIND of war.
Her protagonists are concerned with problematic situations, her influential figures with rigorous settings, her relationships between these two personalities are concerned with manipulations and ultimately, her overall stories are concerned with problematic activities. Create a similar construction with your own history.