Manuscript PublishingPublication of manuscripts
Preparation of a manuscript for publication: An easy-to-use manual
Pediatric Child Health. We are all associated with specialist magazines, whether by literacy, research, writing or proposing them. This comment is intended to stimulate prospective new authors by proposing ways to pave the sometimes uneven road between an initial concept for a piece of work and the goal of their work.
Whilst there are many good grounds for composing a document - for example, for exchanging medical and research findings; for subjecting one's own findings, thoughts and findings to peer review; for giving advice on improving child and adolescent healthcare; for advocating political changes; and to promote individual progress in academia - it also provides an outstanding educational experi ¬ence, fosters discerning thought and improves the capacity to be more succinct in-write.
In order to be able to write, you need to say something that takes a little thought. Developp the custom of using some of these periods to think about typing. What is the target public, and what kind of magazine should this work receive? Who' d like to work with you on this one?
Collect these notions in a notepad, a files directory or your own private electronic wizard, or by emailing yourself. Check and fine-tune the responses. Check this'idea file' on a regular basis. Five-minute here and five-minute there" does not work when you' re typing. They need'real' space to type.
Workaround: Plan the amount of paperwork by making an appointments in your scheduler - once or twice a week for one or two hours. It is a complicated job that demands that you do your best. In order to minimise distraction and interruption in your typing, where is the best place to type - at the workstation, in the home or in the book?
You' ve used your thought and your idea pack. Write times have been planned. Next is to find a'personal editor' and a'writing partner'. First is a good author who is already a good author and is ready to work with you on your work.
Someone like you is your'writing partner' who also wants to type and needs help and courage to do so. It can be the foundation of the subsequent abstracts and will help you to lead your work. Choose your journaling for the first deposit (see below). Please consult your partner about your first design.
Present your second design to your own editors. Well thought-out and discerning checking of the manuscript by all writers and repeated written and rewritten submissions are crucial. A lot of writers find it useful to put the papers aside for a whole weeks and then come back to them - mistakes can be even more blatant.
Keep in mind, no pieces of type will ever be perfectly, but work diligently to make it of high qualitiy. If you, your fellow writer and your own journalist find that your work is finished, submit it to your co-authors for a concluding verification. Refer to Chart 1 for hints on how to overcome frequent pitfalls and pretexts for not spelt.
Ahead of timeGo; make an appointment with yourself - call it a telephone call with yourself. Avoid pressureBook meeting with your copywriter and your own individual editors - make an appointment. Do you need encouragementTalk about your letter with your peers. Your writer and your own copywriter can help you by looking through your'idea file' with you.
Please keep in mind to perform a final spelling, grammatical and credential checking and to ensure that the work is in the desired language version of the magazine chosen for entry. Keep in mind that ghostwriters, generally pharmaceutical financed, must be revealed as such and that this can be a potentially disastrous mistake that excludes publishing in an expertly peer-reviewed magazine.
You can find a detailled listing of hints on how, why and which cases should be written in Jeremy Friedman's supplementary articles in this edition of the magazine (pages 343-344). The patient must know that their cases will be made public. Discussing with the parents or children, followed by reviewing the manuscript, is if possible, perfect.
Since July 2005, all studies in Canada must be enrolled in Health Canada (2). The manuscript must match the intended readership and the assignment of the chosen magazine. Please refer to Table 2 for information on the choice of periodical. Decide what different magazines are publishing by checking the latest editions.
I... ID a journaling that fits your purposes. Sketch and organize the synopsis and reference according to the magazine's unique needs. A further criterion for selecting a magazine is the "impact factor" (3). The number of quotes from an essay in this magazine in other newspapers (quote index).
The New England Journal of Medicine - 38. 570, Journal of the American Medical Association - 24. 781, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry -3. 779, Journal of Pediatrics - 2. 913, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal - 2. 262 und Pediatric Annals - 0. 318 (4). It may be important in some schools, but there are much fewer correlations with regard to the effects on the child and adolescent population' s healthcare (i.e. practices or changes in policy).
Remarkable exemplifications are the release of groundbreaking articles on concomitant measles and the method of low effect polymers. There are many ways to contribute to paediatrics and children's healthcare (5). Her work will be widely recognized and widely disseminated by pediatricians, general practitioners and others with a keen interest in the well-being of young people, as Pediatrics & Child Care is one of Canada's most widely reading specialist magazines.
Where information was presented in the work at a previous academic conference, this shall be noted in a note on the front page. A number of magazines provide "fast tracking", whereby the electronical document will appear in near-realtime ( "if accepted") and the printing document has advanced on the waiting lists of "documents to be printed".
The time of publishing may be important as the item cannot be debated with the mass media while it is in the "press" (i.e. not yet filed, verified or approved but not published) in a peer-review magazine. In the end, a generous mind can be more useful for the improvement of child and adolescent healthcare than a very limited authoring methodology.
First of all, the magazine editors determine whether the theme of the work is suitable for the magazine. When it fits, the journalist chooses peers with recognised professional competence. Instructions for reviewing bio-medical scripts can be found at (7). There are two distinct parts to the book reviews, one "for the publisher only" and another for the author(s) (also seen by the publisher).
Decisions on whether to accept the publication will be made by the publisher on the basis of the recommendations of the reviewers as well as other criteria, such as how well the publication matches the mandate of the magazine, the topicality of the subject, whether the publication is of a material character and not the "least public unit" and the accessibility of magazine slots.
Worth mentioning is the paternal and children's healthcare experts' patience. There are many people who are willing to check a manuscript several occasions and suggest in great detail how a manuscript can be enhanced so that it can be published. Whilst ardent lobbying on children and young people's healthcare is crucial to mobilising social activity, exaggeration without proof is not acceptable.
Some manuscript submitters are absolute - e.g. double entries are not accepted, and another magazine can only be contacted after receiving the reviewer's feedback (and rejection) from the former magazine. If you have been given new testimonials by a reviewed document, quote both the source and the new testimonial.
This manuscript must also have been finally formally prepared and authorized by all writers, from all quoted and recognized resources of private comunication. If your contribution is received or declined, check the commentaries of all evaluators with caution. Don't take them in person, as practically every manuscript in every peer-reviewed magazine requires an overhaul.
Please use these commentaries as a guide to improving your manuscript. In the event that the document is approved with reservation or requested to be resubmitted, make sure that all reviewer reservations have been taken into account before returning the edited document to the publisher. A cover note describing these changes and why the experts' remarks were not taken into account is useful for the publisher.
Third, take your while to think about how to revise and improve the document. Discussing with your own interviewer can be useful if you are trying to access every review. Think about submitting it to another magazine in which the subject might be of greater interest. Sometimes it may make more sense to summarize your document in a short "letter to the editor" to convey the information.
Magazine associations and assessment groups offer great resources for your good literacy work. Pediatrics' strengths in Canada are reflected in many ways, also in our literature. If you are contributing through authoring, you can improve your effectiveness by carefully selecting the magazine of your choosing prior to manuscript production by starting the authoring procedure courageously and quickly, being as clear and concise as possible, pre-empting the results of the manuscript with your staff, and then reviewing and retesting the manuscript.
Pediatrics & Child Health appreciates the possibility to take a leading role in advocating, training and translating research results for the clinic. We also welcome and motivate first authors through our supporting manuscript revision proces. NOTICE: Subscriptions are available for accessing the Thomson ISI Journal Citation Reports. A printed copy of the results is released each year as Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports.
ISI Web of Science, Journals Citation Reports - is available directly from the publishers or from some commercially available providers such as Dialog. While Google Scholar and Scopus contain quoted references and journaling information, they do not browse the entire Thomson ISI Journaling Reports data base.
JCR Science ed Journal Citation Reports, 2004[database on the Internet] Philadephia: The JAMA-peer review for 2002.