How to Write a Damn good novel

Writing a damn good novel

" Damn good" fiction is dramatic fiction, Frey exists, whether from Hemingway or Grisham, Le Carre or Ludlum, Austen or Dickens. Congress catalogue library in the publications database. Frey, James N. How to write a damn good novel. Frey's "How to Write a Damn Good Novel" is one of the most widely used guides for budding authors.

ON HOW TO WRITE A FUCKING GOOD NOVEL.

Writing a damn good novel: No nonsense step-by-step instructions for dramatic storytelling.

Writing a damn good novel is an outstanding reading for novice authors, especially novices. Fréy has filled this volume with useful information that will help authors write a good novel. Whether you've never finished a novel before, or are trying to buff or revise a novel, this is an important and essential resource.

But Frey is good at teaching the author not only what to do, but also how to do it. Discussing many useful authorial techniques, he then gives instances of how these have been used in the works of author success. How to Write a Damn Good Novel tells you which is the most abused and reworked piece of literature, the three rules of vibrant novels, how to get in touch with your audience on an emotive plane, how to create a script, how to choose the best point of view for your novel, and many more essential items for novel composition.

An important note: this volume deals primarily with the techniques of designing a good novel (structure, dialog, creation of vibrant character, etc.). Mentioned this because it seems that How to Write a Damn Good Novel is constantly being likened to other textbooks, ones that deal more with the emotive and psychologic barriers of typing than a basic debate on how to write a good novel.

How to Write a Damn Good Novel in itself is a handy and useful instrument for helping authors with the basic and basic issues of how to structure and write a good novel.

No nonsense step-by-step guide for dramatic storytelling by James N. Frey

Please register to see what your friend thinks about this album. As National Novel Reading approaches Month quickly, I look at my bookshelves and see that I own six volumes about reading. As National Novel Reading approaches Month quickly, I look at my bookshelves and see that I own six volumes about reading.

I will be frank, I don't recall much of this novel except Frey's method of absorbing all the instantaneousness of it. Concerning my analogue about telephone psychology and the raffle, Frey has 12 volumes in his honor. Five's for typing. Could someone please tell me why I am forced to reread so many novels like this if I have no intent to ever write a novel?

After reading some write-related novels (Stephen King's On Reading, Jerry Cleaver's Immediate Fiction, Renni Browne and Dave King's Self-Editing for Fiction Writers and John Gardner's On Becoming a Novelist), I found James Frey's How to Write a Damn Good Novel rather narrow-minded, without details and even banal.

After reading some write-related novels (Stephen King's On Reading, Jerry Cleaver's Immediate Fiction, Renni Browne and Dave King's Self-Editing for Fiction Writers and John Gardner's On Becoming a Novelist), I found James Frey's How to Write a Damn Good Novel rather narrow-minded, without details and even banal.

Whenever Frey gives counsel, he seems doctrinal; it is as if he thinks his way is the right way and other ways are inherently substandard. Whilst giving good advise, the readers should be clear that there are many more methodologies (see Cleaver's book) that may or may not work for a particular author.

Frey's approach may work very well for himself and perhaps for many others, but just as there is no way to tell a tale, there is no way to write a novel. If Frey's way works for you and makes you write better fiction and dialog and history, then well, stay with it and keep it up.

However, if it doesn't work for you, then maybe you should choose another writer's work and try another one. But the point is to find a way that fits you. He' got a practical way, sure. Do XYZ in order and voice over, you have your novel. Everybody can't come up with the whole story without actually having to write it and let the character act it out.

Frey doesn't have room for such a technique. Knowing the character and exactly what will occur in the plot before he even writes a single thing about the plot. That' s why the ledger gets the evaluation it gets. That was all right, because although it was narrow-minded in my view, it had some good pieces of good business.

I' ve learnt a few things, but most of the time Jerry Cleaver's Immediate Fiction will cover all the important information Frey provides, making it better and much more comprehensive. So, I suggest you read Jerry Cleaver's books first. Some of the things I have learnt: 1) Charakter histories can be useful, though not necessary; 2) How to use fade-backs and foreshadowings efficiently; 4) How to write descriptions with a touch of atmosphere.

Cleaver's and King's books (both distinguished, by the way) describe other important things in more detail and comprehensively. It seems that there are about two large classes of scripts. Some concentrate on the interest of the readers and organize your letter so that it can be sold commercial. It seems that there are about two large classes of scripts.

Some concentrate on the interest of the readers and organize your letter so that it can be sold commercial. If I open a textbook on how to write, I don't necessarily want something earth-shattering, because I've been reading a lot of it. Having intellectually understood is not enough to encourage my handwriting, so I am hoping that a handwriting will give me more insights, even if the changes are not exactly quantifiable.

Many of the known basics were dealt with in this book: personality, conflicts, point of view, flashbacks, etc. It used for its example some well-known works, such as Hemingway's Old Man and the Sea, but the work was superficial. My preference is Stephen King's advice in On Writing, which should be revised after the first sketch for the topic.

A line on p. 162 made the whole volume almost valuable: "To be an unreleased writer has about as much acceptance as a storekeeper. "It'?s the best piece you?ll ever see on Revison. Personally, I really enjoy this volume, but a lots of folks miss what it's about, because the writer himself seems to think it's about the first draft.

However, very few folks ever design with the enormous amount of preparedness that Frey proposes: a beatsheet, personality interview, a character's prevailing passions, a premises, a defined pot, a definite solution and furnishing..... It is the best work you will ever see on Revison. Personally, I really enjoy this volume, but a lots of folks miss what it's about, because the writer himself seems to think it's about the first outline.

However, very few folks ever design with the enormous amount of preparedness that Frey proposes: a beatsheet, personality interview, a character's prevailing passions, a premises, a defined pot, a definite solution and furnishing..... The majority of individuals begin to write with only a few of these items in the back of their minds and are discovering.

As Stephen King doesn't know how his novels will end, he can probably scare us so effectively because he can really empathise with the unsuspecting nature of the game. Usually humans uncover personality characteristics by typing their personality through some prebuilt scenarios, seeing their personality take a different turn, etc.

Frey's hints - local, dominant passions, beats, jars, conflicts, indirect dialogues - all occur in the review, when you look at it as a first design and begin to get an order out of what your brains have spent on the page. Create a complete Frey's Element listing and see if your books can really do this.

It is no wonder that a fierce criticism on the back reads: "I wish I had found this novel in my forth revision of my novel. It' one of the best written works I've ever seen. Both with his own imagination and as a teacher of written language, the writer has become firmly entrenched, and this is a clear and handy guide.

Recommended to every budding fictionalist. And the first two sections also had good suggestions: create Charakterbios and create Stepsheets. Also the last section about the practice of typing was good. When I was a red-hot author, I was reading the second one about a dozen years ago (the librarian didn't have the first book).

Of course, you should only buy the last one of a set, as shown by all the unwritten finals of the trilogy that polluted their phantasy shelves). As my boyfriend wanted to rebuild the first and second volumes, I recorded them and gave them a review with ten years of practice and almost as many fiction.

When I was a red-hot author, I was reading the second one about a dozen years ago (the librarian didn't have the first book). Of course, you should only buy the last one of a set, as shown by all the unwritten finals of the trilogy that polluted their phantasy shelves). As my boyfriend wanted to rebuild the first and second volumes, I recorded them and gave them a review with ten years of practice and almost as many fiction.

Best I can say about this ledger is it's not false. Most of the principals Frey speaks about are true and important. After learning a lot of poor practices about how to write that you have to forget, I don't think you're going to leave this books, so there is.

This will not harm your capacity to write from this manual, but since there are tens of thousand of writing guides, this is probably a good excuse to jump over it. Secondly, Frey is really bossy. Unless you want to write in his way, you won't make it as a novelist.

Thirdly, in my view, many of the good practices that Frey describes as "good" are quite terribly wrong. and I know there are a lot of folks out there who just want to tell a great espionage tale and I don't mind how appealing the words are, but still.

Not really I think that most of my favorite romances can be reduced to a singular assumption (perhaps because they're all 1000 pages long?), but it can be a useful practice, especially if you look at a covering note or a summary. Frey, James N. (1987). Writing a damn good novel.

Frey, James N. (1987). Writing a damn good novel. I am careful with every How-to-Look that calls itself "no-nonsense", which means that similar ones are full of mischief. Indeed, this textbook has some rubbish, from the author's tense humour to the fact that it was composed in 1987 ("Keep a think tank of your typewriter").

Nevertheless, it still spans the fundamentals of story telling and its airy styling makes it easily readable, suitable for newbies. Frey's spelling is based on Aristotle's poetics, probably the primary sources for most spellings. It is important to Frey to develop well-motivated personalities who will face and overcome conflicts, culminating in a high point.

This is the right one for you if you didn't know it was being done this way. I didn't actually do that. Some commentaries like these made me wonder about the truthfulness of the whole work. There' s not much debate about the nut and bolt of the pen, such as the choice of point of views (which Frey angrily refers to as the "point of view").

There was a useful differentiation between face-to-face and face dialogue in the section on good dialogue written, but the example of face-to-face dialogue was nothing more than smart-alec tough-guy conversation from a kitschy investigative novel, not useful at all. Overall, if you are a novice, this guide will quickly lead you in the right directions.

Now, I think I've gotten a fairly round initiation into novelism for the beginner. Being a writer and publisher of a publisher, Stein provided very practical suggestions that I could immediately use in my work. Maass, a writer and frahling in a large advertising company, grasped and written about what makes a novel so unique to agencies and readership that it sold well.

Perhaps what was lacking was the writer's point of view, who also taught and trained authors. Now I think I got a rather round initiation into novelism for the beginner. Being a writer and publisher, Stein provided very practical suggestions that I could immediately use in my work.

Maass, a writer and frahling in a large advertising company, grasped and written about what makes a novel so unique to agencies and readership that it sold well. Perhaps what was lacking was the writer's point of view, who also taught and trained authors. And Frey is filling that void very well.

Some of the stone-covering principals such as questioning your personalities and holding in a jar (Maass identified conflicts as the main driver of an escape novel) are repeated by Frey. And what he does add is the meticulous design that can spare a writer some important revisions, such as personality histories, premisses, and crotch-steps ( of which I've never known before and which still don't have a good overview).

Frey ultimately consults the would-be novels on the need for transcription in addition to all the concrete cases for dealing with dialog, point of view, storylark arc, shadowing and others. Especially I liked his last chapters with the title "The Zen of Novel Writing". Nearly wish I could learn with someone like Frey. {\pos (192,210)}How to Write a Damn Good Novel is a damn good one.

I' ve been trying to write a novel since the end of the 90s, but I didn't succeed. but I had no clue how to write a novel. December 2008 I purchased How to Write a Damn Good Novel and went from the first page to the last and tried to absorb every single one.

Well, I was studying the whole thing like a schoolbook. A few month later, I purchased Mr. Frey's follow-up How to Write a Damn Good Novel II. I' ve also been studying this one like a course textbook. I have a damn good script entitled The Emp How to Write a Damn Good Novel. I' ve been trying to write a novel since the end of the 90s, but I didn't succeed.

but I had no clue how to write a novel. December 2008 I purchased How to Write a Damn Good Novel and went from the first page to the last and tried to absorb every single one. Well, I was studying the whole thing like a schoolbook. A few month later, I purchased Mr. Frey's follow-up How to Write a Damn Good Novel II.

I' ve also been studying this one like a coursebook. But Mr. Frey's inspirations and direction made me stop reflecting on my writings and begin to write. Thanks, Mr. Frey! That was a good start: "It was a good start: "Unfortunately, the novel was a disappointment. Naturally, the 1987 publication could have explained a great deal of it - the "keep x by your typewriter" reference and the professional typing directions for the definitive script, for example.

None of this can probably be given because I doubted that Mr Frey thought that PCs and text processing systems and e-mails would be so widespread in such a small area. However, much of his other counsel -- about how to write, how to write, how to write styles -- also felt dated. What's more, he was a good writer. When someone out there thinks that the kind of book being released today is exactly the same as 1987, they are mistaken.

At least in my view, textbooks are now a bit more edgy, a bit more sharp. To write on a computer monitor is a very different kind of thing from to write on a piece of hard copy. You' re gonna have to write every single damn night. Knowing that the very act of typing differs from individual to individual, I wanted to just toss the novel against the next barrier every single moment I was reading something like this.

Writing a damn good novel is an outstanding reading for novice authors, especially novices. Fréy has filled this volume with useful information that will help authors write a good novel. It covers everything from characters and conflicts to story telling and dialog. Whether you've never finished a novel before, or are trying to buff or revise a novel, this is an important and essential resource.

Writing a damn good novel is an outstanding reading for novice authors, especially novices. Fréy has filled this volume with useful information that will help authors write a good novel. It covers everything from characters and conflicts to story telling and dialog. Whether you've never finished a novel before, or are trying to buff or revise a novel, this is an important and essential resource.

But Frey is good at teaching the author not only what to do, but also how to do it. Discussing many useful author-interest techniques, he then gives instances of how these have been used in the works of author success. How to Write a Damn Good Novel tells you which is the most abused and reworked piece of literature, the three rules of vibrant novels, how to get in touch with your audience on an emotive plane, how to create a script, how to choose the best point of view for your novel, and many more essential items for novel composition.

An important note: this volume deals primarily with the techniques of designing a good novel (structure, dialog, creation of vibrant character, etc.). Mentioned this because it seems that How to Write a Damn Good Novel is constantly being likened to other textbooks, ones that deal more with the emotive and psychologic barriers of typing than a basic debate on how to write a good novel.

How to Write a Damn Good Novel in itself is a handy and useful instrument for helping authors with the basic and basic issues of how to structure and write a good novel. January 21, 2009 D.w. I can't imagine how many years I've had this novel and only reread it up to the first chap.

I' ve got several literary novels that tell you how to do it. Can' t imagine how many years I have had this manuscript and only reread it up to the first part. I' ve got several literary novels that tell you how to do it. In this sense (in writing) this work adds to my way of becoming a better author and working on my work?

There are some sound policies Frey gives that should not be ignored, but he, as so many want to do, tells a novelist the phrase that worked for them and that their way is the right one. Three writers, reading three of them about the trade, and you'll find three ways.

Consider the contexts that Frey can bring to the trip. Working on what Frey's made available. It' s a sleek slice, on 170 pages, followed by a second volume, and then a genre-related work. Makes me think he knew he had more to write, but he had to finish it.

It is a good complement for those who refine their crafts. It would take more than Frey has, but it would be a good first or third or even 10th volume to complement your own lessons to become a better author. Probably one could talk of a structure-finding prime, together with a motivating statement by a novelist.

Here are excerpts from works of classic literary works such as "The Godfather, Lolita, A Christmas Carol in Lute, Madame Bovary, The Old Man and the Sea" as illustrative samples of technique described in the work. Provides good viewing opportunities. In view of the relatively short length of the text, a large number of subjects will be considered to provide a good outline.

It' s real and commendable for the work that can only be imagined with the same equipment to produce a reasonably tolerable first novel. They only need basic instruction in order not to be too busy with typing at the beginning and not to overfill with terminology and high quality work.

It is an open issue whether the way of typing says something about the person, whether it is consciously provocative for the promotion of a sale or whether all phrases are taken so seriously. It' s clear that Frey has not only produced a guidebook for a novel, but also a moody and enjoyable novel, never claiming to write well-founded lit.

Quite the opposite, he always points out the importance and aim of his work to create ordinary novel. After all, the evaluation of a given volume cannot only focus on personal experiences. At the end of the day, results and utility matter, and Frey thinks that this pledge applies especially to beginners and authors, with nothing more than the call for entertainment.

What is certain is that Frey has not only written a guide for a novel, but also an curieux and divertaining book and never claims to create profound literature. I have been advised to read this work by a prominent orator whom I admire. And I asked a clearing questions about this one.

Said that although it is intended for budding fiction writers, the orators will benefit a lot from it. Describing it as a novel that changed his speech. There were two things I couldn't get rid of with this book: 1. Much too much was included in the cover, citing much more from other works than the addition of source text. This manuscript was suggested to me by a respected spokesman.

And I asked a clearing questions about this one. Said that although it is intended for budding fiction writers, the orators will benefit a lot from it. Describing it as a novel that changed his speech. There were two things I couldn't get rid of with this book: Much too much was included in the cover, citing much more from other works than the addition of source text.

Hopefully at least a fourth of the original was cited. I don't think at the end of the novel I could quote how to write a novel, let alone a damn good one. Only a few pages of how to rework the manuscript. I' m not going to be reading another one of this author's books.

Presumably this will remove it from the cellar of the letter. How to Write a Damn Good Novel de James N. Frey : Providing a step-by-step guide without nonsense for dramatic storytelling is an outstanding introduction to the basics of novel composition. And Frey is a good instructor, and that is expressed in his work.

It provides many outstanding hints and tools that many authors would take to heart. He' s great at explaining the backgrounds of creating fictions. It quotes a few 20th century novels about so much so that I was forced to keep an I' James N. Frey's How to Write a Damn Good Novel:

Providing a step-by-step guide without nonsense for dramatic storytelling is an outstanding introduction to the basics of novel composition. And Frey is a good instructor, and that is expressed in his work. It provides many outstanding hints and tools that many authors would take to heart. He' s great at explaining the backgrounds of creating fictions.

It quotes some twentieth-century novels about writings so much that I was forced to cancel one I've already reread - Lajos Egri's The Art of Dramatic Scripting, initially released in 1947 - and remember what it had to say. That' when I realised there was nothing particularly new in Frey's work.

It has not lent itself to unethical or unattributed borrowing; it only seems to re-learn the same information as in the Egri-Guide. Don't get me wrong: This is a beautiful volume, with great contents that are well-prepared. Every author who has not studied the Egri will no doubt learnt a great deal from Frey.

It is a really great novel about what the basic ingredients are to write a really great novel. All the important factors are dealt with by the author: personality progression, conflicts, premises, causality, culmination and solution, point of view, dialog, transcription and even a quasi-inspirational section on what it needs to become a great writer (note: it requires a lot of patience + effort).

It is a really great novel about what the basic ingredients are to write a really great novel. All the important factors are addressed: personality progression, conflicts, premises, causality, culmination and solution, point of view, dialog, transcription and even a quasi-inspirational section on what it needs to become a great writer (note: it requires a lot of patience + effort).

I gave 4/5 sterns to the 4/5 is because the author's sound is often too doctrinal. Some of the points he had made about his formulae for composing a great novel I did not agree with. A further argument for the 4-star award is that the novel would primarily appeal to anyone who writes a drama novel of the literature type.

Perhaps even closer to the point that it would be most useful for someone to write the story of a great investigator or novel. Somebody who is tempted, for example, to write a philosophy or psychology novel may not profit so much from this work. Aside from the above criticism, however, it is a great Enlightenment work, which is very important for the creation of a great novel.

In this case I appreciate the work very much and commend it to authors from beginner to advanced. Absolutely the best - and in my view only a rewarding writing work. Absolutely the best - and in my view only a rewarding writing work.

Not only does this volume put everything into an easy-to-understand form, it also contains lots of good and evil stories, but it does it to make you think through it. It would be a pleasure to take Frey's courses, but it' a great second best to read.

Damn Good Novel was given to me as a present when I began to complain about not being able to write. Fast-reading and easy to access, this was almost like an autofocus. Altogether, it has been a great year for presents, and I greatly appreciate that I have received this work as a kind of encouraging loving pinch.

It is so interesting to see how much design, work and implementation goes into producing a truly entertaining work. Mr. Frey does a good job spelting out the big renters by making a drama novel in a way that is fun, useful, and easy to understand. Lots of samples and lots of question that really make you think about your print font plans.

Good is good to write, but good is better.... don't hesitate... that can' Ahhhh - dive into a box I like so much, but from the other side of the can. It is so interesting to see how much design, work and implementation goes into producing a truly entertaining work. Mr. Frey does a good job spelting out the big renters by making a drama novel in a way that is fun, useful, and easy to understand.

Lots of samples and lots of question that really make you think about your print font plans. No, it can' be... it can' be. Thanks God for 2. designs and a good thing I didn't meet, the Submit-Bu..... Recommended for: someone interested in doing a novel.

I really don't like the author's bragging sound, but I can't help but say that I learnt a great deal from the work. I am careful with any how-to-book that calls itself "no-nonsense," which means that similar titles mean the opposite. Actually, this work has some rubbish, some due to the author's tense humour, others due to the fact that it was composed in 1987 ("Keep a thesaurus by your typewriter").

Nevertheless, it still spans the fundamentals of story telling and its airy styling makes it easily readable, suitable for newbies. I' m careful with every How-to-Look that calls itself "no-nonsense", which means that similar ones mean the opposite. Actually, this work has some rubbish, some due to the author's tense humour, others due to the fact that it was composed in 1987 ("Keep a thesaurus by your typewriter").

Nevertheless, it still spans the fundamentals of story telling and its airy styling makes it easily readable, suitable for newbies. Frey's spelling is based on Aristotle's poetics, probably the primary sources for most spellings, so you can't go too far with it. It is important to Frey to develop well-motivated personalities who will face and overcome conflicts, culminating in a high point.

This is the right one for you if you didn't know it was being done this way. I didn't actually do that. A few instances like these made me wonder about the truthfulness of the remainder of the work. There' s not much debate about the be-all and end-all of scriptwriting, such as the choice of the narrator's point of departure (which Frey angrily refers to as the "point of departure").

There was a useful differentiation between face-to-face and face dialogue in the section on good dialogue written, but the example of face-to-face dialogue was nothing more than smart-alec tough-guy conversation from a kitschy investigative novel, not useful at all. Well, if you're a rookie, this won't do you any harm.

Mehr zum Thema