How to Write a Book Review Essay

RULES FOR THE WORKING OUT OF REVIEW ARTICLES

ï§ Please have a look at the foreword, looking for a message about the key objective, prospects and topics. Then you should carefully study the whole book. There is more point in having a look at the most important topics and suggestions. After every section, review the most important topics and brainstorms in this section and write these items down.

If you are reading the book, please consider having a conversation with the writer. Submit a question to the writer and see if you are happy with the book's responses. References should contain succinct information on the topic, problem or topic to which the book refers.

The essay should contain short abstracts of the authors' main points and findings and a debate on the way in which they have drawn their findings. The review should also contain a debate with explanatory notes on the strength and weakness of the book. After all, no review would be exhaustive without a debate and statement of the scope to which each book adds to our knowing and comprehension of the story.

Clearly define all useable keywords used by the book's authors. Give adequate samples and proof to back up your findings and generalisations. The review essay should be about ten typescript pages long. All review articles must be written in a single typeface (preferably 12 cpi), with a 1-inch border on all pages, and must be in two lines.

Examples of book review and review articles can be found in various historic periodicals or in the Book Review Digest or Current Book Review Citations. These" sample" responses and sites are for general orientation only; they are not to be used as a resource for certain thoughts to be incorporated into your review.

Minimise the use of quotes directly from the book you are reviewing. When quoting the writer directly, make sure that the quoted text is enclosed in quotes and that you specify the page where the quoted text will be found. This is a book review essay, not a book review.

Is it imprecise or "wrong" by Borowski, Spiegelman or Wiesel to include such stories in their stories?