How to tell if you are a good WriterWhat does it take to know if you are a good writer?
It' s good to hear,'You are a good writer', but if your value as a character depends on your letter being approved, I have to think you have a sorrow. When you need to ask if you're a good writer to make it, you probably aren't; you probably need to keep at it.
When you remain preoccupied and do what you as a writer should do, you know that you are good without asking. There are five indications that you're a good writer: I' m not saying that the person nearest to you cheers you up and tells you you're good - I'm saying that you' re good - I'm saying that you' re good.
Are you a writer; are you one of the best in your field? Tell you authors who respected you that you are good (but still point out how you can be an even more powerful writer)? When you are told that you are good by those who have no other reasons to tell you that you are good (i.e. they do not have to accept you when they say: "This is a little weak...."), then you are on the right path.
Stand back and look at your handwriting. Look at your letter for real. Would you say, "That's good" if someone gave you what you wrote? The majority of authors know when they can make a particular sequence more powerful; they also know when they can do something more. When you can look at your handwriting with your eye objectively and see the good and the evil, when you are not already a good writer, at least move in the right directions.
Compar your work with the authors you are aiming for. Is it shuddering to think about what you write to the authors you worship? Well, if so, keep typing! I' m not saying that if you likeness your oeuvre to the attempt maker out location that you are deed them in the dirtiness (because you probably don't), but you should awareness cocksure relative quantity in your oeuvre to see it on a furniture in a product workplace alongside different maker doing analogous product.
When you think you still have a way to go before you sense this trust, continue with it. When all you get over a number of years is rejection, you probably need to improve your abilities further. Whilst filing your work is subjectively, part of it as a writer is finding the right places for your letter, and if you don't see some random achievement over the years - while it doesn't always mean you are not good (publishing is full of great authors who face facing walls after walls of rejections) - it might be a good indication that you still need to find out a few more things.
If you don't kid yourself, you'll have a good time. If you' ve experienced nothing but refusals that run according to the motto'You're gifted, but that's not my thing', you know that the public recognizes your writing skills. Making it small is not always an indicator of whether you are good or not; some folks just don't make it, despite their aptitudes.
There is always room for expansion, of course; I think most of us - even if we are very successful as authors - will be dying and feel that we could have been even better. So... are you a good writer?