How to know if a Book is Nonfiction

Knowing whether a book is a non-fiction book

Have a look at the back of the title page (on the back). There should be a phone number in the middle or below. Will the Library of Congress indicate this in its catalogue? If I introduce the students to a new genre of reading or writing, I like to immerse them in this kind of book. The same principle applies whether you write fiction or narrative non-fiction.

Differentiation between fiction and non-fiction

The best way to differentiate between a work of fictional literature and a work of non-fiction literature is sometimes to look at the back and see how it is grouped. Literature and nonfiction can have a storyline, a set and even more. And they both seem like the real thing.

Non-fiction should be objective. That means that journal contributions, journalistic contributions, encyclopaedia contributions, all are non-fiction. There are many corridors in bookshops full of non-fiction - the areas of cookery, arts, travel, sciences, religions, true crimes, ecology and decoration contain all the facts. There are no quick and tough regulations about what makes an article a" literary", but a good wager is that an article has a little more of a history than, say, a prescription or a section in a schoolbook.

The genre of biography, autobiography, essays and memoir is one that can be regarded as either written or nonfiction. Fictional works are primarily fictional or imaginative. Shorts, fictions and novels of different subspecies - romanticism, sci-fi, historical clichés, mysteries - are regarded as clichés. A fictional narrative usually contains storyline elements: storyline, character, attitudes and topics.

There are facts in many works of art of the fictional, for example the historic fictional uses information about a certain period of history to provide a reasonable and real framework for an invention. Belles lettres are "literary" if they have a good name, usually because of their excellent stylistic or characterisation. There can be a blurred line between the fictional and the non-fiction, especially in fact-based memoir or novel.

It is generally accepted that certain non-fiction books allow a certain degree of consolidating or reordering of a history to tell a tale and to convey a river, even if this means that the work does not follow all the facts. In" The Line Between Fact and Fiction" writer Roy Peter Clark declares that non-fiction authors often use the instruments of novelist authors and that 50 years ago still today reporters would make more interesting stories by inventing detail and quotations.

Today there are more stringent rules for lies in the world of writing, and while there is still room to spread the word in the form of bloody non-fiction such as memoir and essay, there is a point at which misrepresentation of the facts is inacceptable. The marketing of non-fiction titles such as "A Million Little Pieces" and "Three Cups of Tea" led to an outcry.

Others, such as Sylvia Plath's classics "The Bell Jar", are regarded as books, although they are written on the authors' own work. If you want to distinguish between a fictional and a non-fiction book, the best way is to find out which works adhere to the facts. When there is something that cannot be real (flying monster in space), it is notion.

However, if you don't know the facts, you can sometimes identify non-fiction by its notation. Books tend to keep better to the times and present information in a simpler way - often using years and data as well as the real nouns of houses, towns and so on. The fictional is created to give the delusion of reality.

Mehr zum Thema