How to begin a Story in first Person

The first person to start a story

And I reached the door, and I ripped it open and dived in. This is one reason why I always start a scene with a header that says who the POV character is. Normally a story is told from the perspective of the first or third person. Is it useful to tell your story from several angles? We' ve found evidence that readers report that they are more absorbed in stories told from the first person's perspective and that they like these stories better.

Letter in the first person

First person vocal is one of those areas of novelism that seems easy at first sight, but is a little more complex if you want to type like a pro. I' ll start by trying to explain why it is not easy to compose first-person-prosa. So, what's complex about first person typing?

It all depends on the distinction between the storyteller and the nature of the point of view. will be the part of me that writes the words in the here and now. It will be the part of me that actually experiences the story's happenings at the moment of its creation.

Narrators will be older (and probably smarter) than the nature of the point of view. There may be a small amount of disparity in terms of aging - perhaps only one full working days or weeks - in this case the aging gaps make no distinction. But, for example, if the storyteller is 80 years old and looks back on an event that occurred to them at the tender of 18, they will hardly be the same person.

He will have been altered by the novel's happenings, while the nature of the point of view has not yet experienced this one. So, the first person's letter is as simple as a master's: you must mirror the distinction between the storyteller and the point of view nature in it.

It was the first time I ever known Melanie the night I turned thirteen. I couldn't get myself to talk to her, of course, I couldn't even look at her, except for a look of secrecy as she dealt with the boring square formulas the schoolteacher tried to elucidate on the plank, but by the end of that first hour I had already fell in Love with her.

I' m not claiming that it's great reading, but it's okay to explain the letter in the first person. In the accompanying essay - Letter in the Third Person - I explain that a characteristic sequence in a third person's novel begins with the storyteller "setting the stage for the scene" before he slips into the character's hide and shows the rest of the plot through her eye.

Are you able to have a similar effect in the first person? In a third person novel, the storyteller is like a cameraman or a divine being floating above the happenings as they do. The" establishment shot" in the third person's excerpt was the storyteller who described the rains that fell on the roofs.

It would have given the sequence a stirring filmic feeling, but it would not have worked in an ego-story. An ego storyteller looks back on past occurrences - in this case a 40-year-old man who looks back on something that occurred when he was a 13-year-old male.

An ego-storyteller can only use a geographic depiction if he has actually seen what he describes. The" establishment shot" in the example of the third person concerned the storyteller who described the rains that fell on the roofs. It would have given the sequence a stirring filmic feeling, but it would not have worked in an ego-story.

An ego-storyteller can only use the geographic designation if he has actually seen what he describes. If the example of the first person had been a journey to the sea, the storyteller could have described his first look at the sea, then he would have had the gulls eating in the laundry at low watermark as he walked over the tide-hardened sands - that would have worked well.

However, he could not have divinely described the rains that fall from above on the roofs, because when you write in the first person, the only "camera" you have is the viewer's view. In the first person's example above, the way the storyteller stages the sequence is to give an expedited, double-digit report on his case for the young woman from the date he first saw her until the date he asked her out.

In this case, the sequence itself concentrates on the date itself, especially the first kisses. So in the first two passages, it is the 40-year-old narrator's speech we hear, not the teenager's one. As the storyteller, you will recall, looks back on past incidents, while the nature of the point of view is a young man who experiences the incidents as they do.

What is practically the discrepancy between the older narrator's and the younger narrator's voice? There is a slight discrepancy between the two, but the second line is definitely more youthful and casual than the first. Cause it'?s the kid this story?s all about, not the man.

In the same way that a readership is not interested in a third person storyteller (who is not a real figure in the story), it is not interested in a first person storyteller - at least not as much as it is interested in the nature of the point of view or the younger and more naïve self of the storyline.

Now there' s obviously a big distinction between a 40-year-old man and a young teenager. If, in your first novel, the storyteller is a 40-year-old man who looks back on the past months happenings, the distinction between the storyteller and the positional nature will not be nearly as pronounced.

However, the distinction remains - not least because the storyteller has already witnessed the happenings and has been altered by them, while this point of view is still in the be... After reading many first-person essays by novices, I know that most of them do not take into consideration this subtle but important distinction between a first-person storyteller and a first-person visual personality.

You may not even know the differences.

Auch interessant

Mehr zum Thema