How not to Write a BookLike not writing a book
Retrospect: Like not writing a novel by Sandra Newman and Howard Mittelmark. Book.
It is a ) because the literature community is a members-only gang devoted to excluding new talents; b) because editors and operatives are chronic and just couldn't bother to see the astonishing ending that is the whole meaning of the whole thing; or c) because it's a lot of ponies from beginning to end.
You' ve been reading handbooks on how to compose a novel, you may have even visited a group of writers. Yet, like Belshazzar at the festival, you didn't understand the script on the mural. In order to find out exactly how your work was weighted and found to be inadequate, see How to Change a Novel, in which Sandra Newman and Howard Mittelmark lists all the key elements of the classical stink.
The Newman and Mittelmark are characteristic of horrible fiction, often so accurate that even the most vain recognize their own howler monkeys and tastes. Anyone familiar with the mud heap, the specialist word for the heap of unasked scripts to publishing houses and agencies, knows that cruel books are the same, depressing.
"We' ll take this opportunity to reminds you that the aim of the letter is to communicate.... the readers should be able to find out what you are saying without having to call and ask you personally." It identifies one of the classical errors of the unpublished efforts they made "The Benign Tumor.....
A dark assassination tale I once came across, the writer of which had obviously been reading Louis de Bernières in the centre, and which all of a sudden jumped with a parachute in a cargo of cheerful farmers who had nothing to do with it. Given that you have been writing an unpublished novel (yes, of course I have at least one myself - most authors begin their career with more poor books in their pigeonholes than socks), this is such a sad event that it is driving many into profounddenialism.
The Newman and Mittelmark complement this one counseling so invaluably that it is valuable to all the others put together: "and the more good texts you learn, the better you become a writer." They are all good authors and excellent readership. When you can't bother dragging through the canons because James and Dickens and Nabokov and all these people are too hard, you should really consider taking up another one.