Fiction Writing Software

Belletristic Software

However, our science fiction add-on software shows you how to overcome each one. Are Scrivener the best fiction software and what does Scrivener cost? She is the creator of Novel Factory, a software developed by authors for authors. Writes novels and short stories and leads a writing group. These are some of the pens amateur writers swear by.

Scripter: An overview of an author's software program

I attended a great course with Gwen Hernandez in March about working with the scrivener application Scrivener. Scripting, available from Literature and Latte, is widely praised as an absolutely marvelous tool for typing, and while I had obsessed it for a while, I knew I needed instruction to take full use of its many functions.

I' m ending the months with a greater degree of convenience when using Scrivener - in fact, this article is posted in Scrivener. All in all, however, I still have a few doubts about how useful it is in comparison to conventional text processing programs. WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get - pronounced Wizziwig) is not a wordprogramm.

I' m old enough to recall how thrilling it was to get a WYSIWYG editor to see what your file would look like. Scrivener is a review of a period when typeswriters were the only way to put your history on tape and then you gave it to a computer to actually put a page.

Scrivener is anything but a setback; it is a full-featured, full-featured, complex game. However, let us debate the WYSIWYG issue. Create in WYSIWYG. Novell Friedlander offers a range of designs that can be used by writers to create a MSWord work. Instead, I want to concentrate on my experiences in a precise WYSIWYG workspace.

Scrivener' Compose pane will isolate the font on its own display and help you concentrate. But on the other side, I type this in Scrivener, and it's definitely NOT WYSIWYG. I write in the Compose pane, which turns off any other pane on my computer and help me concentrate on my work.

Gwen Hernandez's volume Scrivener for Dummies is 70 pages long due to its intricacies. It is a very easy copy and pasting into my blogsoftware. However, it is not WYSIWYG; it is an additional formatting tool. Many people say the nice thing about Scrivener is that you can print the same font in several different file types.

This is an asset for some and a twitch of the shoulders for others. I may never choose between WYSIWYG and non-WYSIWYG workspaces. However, if you consider Scrivener to be your favorite text editor, you have to address the WYSIWYG issue. A major benefit of Scrivener is the possibility to keep an eye on meta information or on it.

This is not much different from a text editor that allows an overview of the structure. However, in Scrivener, each element is its own set of elements, and you can rearrange these elements by dragging and dropping them. Obviously, the issue is: do you often have to reorganize your work? Secondly, you can highlight any filename (which can be a sequence, a section of a descriptive text, or an entire section - it's up to you what's in a filename and how fine-grained it is) by using one of three methods: Label, Keyword, Status.

State. Standard state markers begin with "To Do" and go to "Finished". You can use the state for anything you want. Imagine using a fictitious scenery with the words used here as a watermark in the corkboard. Visually, the settings seemed to be a good use for meta data.

You can customize all of your existing data. Key words have no standard settings; the fun niest thing here is the possibility to select a directory with a coloured tabs. If, for example, your key words are signs, you can see all the files labeled Orange for Villain in the top right corner of the corkboard.

If there are more selected letters (or keywords), it becomes less useful and less bewildering. You have three other ways of organizing your letter in addition to the hierarchical structure. You can browse your projects for any selected file. To keep this screen, you can browse for the TO DO state until all your documents have been edited.

Meta data is sufficiently versatile to include cookery books (keywords: hen, cow, calf, etc.), dictionaries (keywords: characters' names) or non-fiction books (keywords: fact, quotation, oblique quotation, opinions, analysis, etc.). However, the system of meta data that tames the mess of typing does not seem to me to be an intuition. I' ve been looking for what others have done with all this meta data.

First I asked Gwen Hernandez how she used the meta data. Said it changes with every single one of my projects, and I shouldn't be worried about the methadata, I should just type until I felt the need to split the file and then choose which to use. Secondly, I checked the Scrivener template to see how they used the meta data.

The majority simply use the hierachical structures and disregard the meta data. All of the template I download and install have not used any of the tags, key words, and statuses. Which meta data do we need to know during creation? Does a single hierarchies suffice or do we really need meta data? It became clear to me after this Scrivener grade that the shrunken manuscript handled meta data, but in a manually and visually way.

Now, I know the value of methadata and make it visible. The one thing I will try with Scrivener is how meta data can work for us without assuming a degree of complexities that make it incriminating. All in all, a presumed benefit of Scrivener is its capacity to keep your typing organised.

This is done with a straightforward hierarchy and the possibility to insert meta data in three ways. However, I have found few cases where humans can actually use the meta data or tell when and where and why they use it. I' ll tell you about it after trying out some of my own suggestions and working with Scrivener for a while.

Thought I was wise when I switched my Microsoft MS Word to back up every 2 seconds; the back up every 2 seconds is great - and Scrivener does it smoothly in the back, without hesitation or problems..... The Scrivener has a built-in method to monitor productivity: words per meeting, objectives, daily number of words, percent of finished projects, etc.

Of course, this is possible with text processing programs, but Scrivener makes it easy. All in all, I am still indecisive about Scrivener. You can ask me next year if I'm still using the programme. Download the picture book checklist now!

Verify your e-mail to validate your subscriptions and we will send you the picture book list directly.

Mehr zum Thema