Book Review Article example

Books review Article example

Writing an article review in a few steps: Example, structure, formating A article review is a play review where you sum up and rate someone else's article. It is the aim of the awarding of book reviewers to familiarize the student with the work of the well-known experts in a certain subject area. Each of these experts must also regularly review the other's article.

In order to summarise the article correctly, it is necessary to understand the nature of the work, its reasoning and its key points. It is your responsibility to evaluate the key topic, its supportive rationale and prospects for further research in the given area. As with any other composition composed, a review of an article will require thorough preparations.

Therefore, the article review write-up procedure is divided into two phases: preparing and reviewing. The purpose of this overview is to summarise the nature of the article, its main points of view and insights, and the author's approach to the topic. To write an article does not only mean to express your opinions about the work. This is a comprehensive assessment of the author's views set out in the article.

While analyzing the article, use your own research experiences and your own thoughts. Her general conclusion about the article is based on her own judgement, supported by her own expertise and her own reason. You' re only talking about the research that the article's writer has already done. It is important to know exactly how you will write your article before reading it.

That is because you should know which items of the article are the most important for your review in advance. What are you looking for? As a rule, the article overview goes like this: Draw attention to possible information loopholes, logic ambiguities, contradictions of suggestions, open questioning, etc. Decide whether the facts provided are enough to support the author's key point.

Scroll through the article heading, summary and headlines. Please have a look at the introductory part, the conclusions, the first few phrases of each section. Then, please have a look at some introductory sections. That should be enough to understand the author's key points and arguments. Then you should start studying the whole article. The purpose of this first lesson is only to get an impression of the point the writer was trying to make with this article.

When you come across ideas or conceptions that you do not fully comprehend, or when you encounter a question, take a note. Consult words you are not familiar with so that you can fully comprehend the article. Please continue to study the article a few more time. These are the most significant parts, the key points and the facts that underpin them.

Instead, take note at the edges and make links between different parts of the article. Add what you already know about the topic to what you have already been reading. It can be something you talked about at your own classroom or something you yourself have been reading. Do your available know-how endorse the article's idea or does it conflict with it?

Draw attention to the resemblance the article bears with what you have previously seen about the subject and the difference. When you come across a section that you do not fully comprehend, you should not keep it that way. The only way you can make a sound article is to make sure you know everything there is to know about the article.

Preferably in text format, e.g. in the shape of a sketch or a free letter. In essence, you put the information you have just been reading into your own words. It should contain the author's statement, the research carried out and the argument(s). Instead, you should rather follow the key points of the article.

After retelling the essence of the article, take your own free moment to choose what parts are really interesting to review. But it is also rewarding to focus on certain points such as the contents, the interpretations of facts, the theory, the narrative styles, etc.

Then, compile and summarise the list of strengths and weaknesses. One strength may be the addition of new information, for example, and a disadvantage may be the inaccuracy in the presentation of available information on the subject. Include these results in your research and back them up with proof from the text of the article.

The answers to these e-mails should make it easier for you to write sketches: So what was the aim of the article? How important is the article in its area of expertise? Your rating should refer to the review theme you selected in one of the preceding stages. Titles can be described, declared or questioning.

It should be titled. Most of your review should begin right after this quote without skip a line. HOWEVER, for example, here is how you would like to quote an article in Chicago/Turabian Formats style: Enter the general information about the article you are currently reading. Begin your review by stating the article cover, the author(s), the magazine cover and the year of pub.

As an example. This article "Studies in pop rock and coke" was created by John Smith and Jane Doe. It should be the outermost saconic core of the article under consideration. Here you enter the author's theses. When the dissertation is not mentioned in the article, it is up to you to find it out for yourself.

It should also contain the article's key topic and the author's key message. You can use your own words to describe the article's key claims, key points and research results. Show how the proofs support the case in the article. Check your intro to make sure it reads the article correctly.

That is the essence of the review. Use your abstract to describe how well the article covers the subject. Evaluate how clear and understandable the article is. Usually you will be asked to discuss each of the key points of the article individually and describe how well the given proofs support them.

In the end, you decide how the writer will contribute to the comprehension of the topic and thus to the general meaning of the article. Completing the bulk of your review, you suggest to your readers exactly what they can get out of it. This should be about the strengths and weaknesses of the article with its description, which are eventually linked to each other to make your own reviewer's theses.

Ensure that your article review is linked to the section in which you review it. It' rewarding to repeat that a review is not your own view. The question is how important and pertinent this article is. Conclusions are usually a sales long and do not take more than 10% of your article review.

Here you briefly formulate the key points of the article, as well as your assessment of how good and important the article is. In addition, make sure that all the information gets to the point and rule out anything that isn't so important, but don't become too fanatical: a review doesn't have to speak about less (and best of all no more) than 3-4 notable topics.

Mehr zum Thema