Best word Processors for Writing NovelsThe best word processor for writing novels
What word processing software should I use to write a novel?
If you are using Windows, Microsoft Office Word is the best choice. I' ve written my first novel completely on this piece of code and it has become really simple for me. How large should I use when writing a novel in Microsoft Word? What is the best way to use word processors on a Chromebook? What are word processing programs used for?
Must I use English to compose a novel? Which are the best book writing softwares? How is a word processing program used? Things to do with a word-processing program? How do publishing houses use word processing programs? What typeface and fontsize should I use to create a novel in MS Word?
What words should be used to compose articles? What writing utilities do authors use when writing a novel? With which text editing software should I use? Do you really think it's so hard to use a few "filler words" when writing a novel? If I wanted to know how many words to type a novel, how many words would I know?
Is it possible to compose a 100-page novel?
Creation of an authoring toolkit, part 1: Favourite word processor
Each author works differently, but I think we all have at least one similar goal: to use the writing experience as effectively as possible. Some of the authoring instruments we use can help us or prevent us from making the most of our times. Throughout a long period I have been using a number of utilities that I build myself - primarily my Google Docs Writing Tracker, and this has contributed to solving some of the issues that make it hard for me to type on a unified base.
I' d like to take advantage of the lesson I've learnt over two years with my Google Docs Writing Tracker and see how I can do more. The best way to start this is to think about the best writing instruments I have used in the past.
Since the most important writing instrument for me is a word processing program, I thought I'd do it. The very first word processing program I used in a convenient way was AppleWorks. Remember I tried to create a newletter with AppleWorks and write one or two books with AppleWorks, but as a writing utility, it's not that great in my head.
It took me a long while to complete some of these jobs, and when I look back, I guess it was an effort to offer a WYSIWYG screen that distracted me. I' ve probably used 10x as much of my free space to format my document as I write it. âThis was to become my word processors through my second year in high school, say from 1987-1991.
This was my very first try to write a novel in WordPerfect, sometime in the middle to the end of the 80s. 1991 I changed to Word for 5.5. And I don't remember why I chose to change back then. I may have been reading about Word 5. In the dormitory coffee shop, I used the cash I made to buy a copy of Word for my own computer, and immediately fallen in love with it.
Until today Word for Windows 5.5 is my favourite word processor. Until I got my first (and still the only) position in the university, I used Word for that. They used Word for Windows, and I changed at that time. I used different versions of Word for Windows from about 1994 to 2007 or 2008.
I' ve written innumerable tales in Word, among them the first tale I've ever made. I have been using Scrivener since 2008. At that time I had changed to a Mac at home, and Scrivener was great. There were three things I thought were very important in a word processing program for writers:
separates the contents level from the display level. That means you didn't worry about reformatting. They would write your contents and "compile" them into a default script (or e-book), similar to compiling it. The Scrivener had a beautiful "distraction-free" full-frame view. Focusing on the contents, not the style, the distraction-free look allowed me to concentrate on my writing.
Scrivener' s functionality and capabilities were designed to support the writing and authoring processes. Word needs to be a generalised tool, and therefore it tries to do everything. Scrivener was full of functionality, but these functionalities concentrated on the things that were useful to authors. I' ve used Scrivener for many years to write tales that I would finally be selling, and I think it has made me a more prolific author.
However, in the end I found some restrictions that made it difficult for me to automatize some of my writing work. At that time I switched to Google Docs. While Google Docs provided many of the benefits of Scrivener, there were also compromises. For example, it does not differentiate between the contents and display levels.
These may seem like little things, but as someone who can only find a little amount of alone quality case all era (sometimes as small as 1o point), any work I could eliminating implementation implementation statesman case for oeuvre. I could do much more with Google Docs. The Google Docs Writing Tracker is automating a few things:
Anyway, it does statistics on my writing - how many words of my writing?-?how articles, which is my 7-days avg. and saves the information in a Google spreadsheet. I use RescueTime information to track how much writing work I do every workday. Using the information I collect from my Google Docs Writing Tracker myself, I have scripting that generates all types of chart.
For example, I can see what my writing has been like in the last 6 months: I' ve also got a script that allows me to see a heat map of my letter for every single letter until February 2013: I' m not spending my life compiling these graphs and statistics.
Googles Docs provides enough API to automate this, which means I can use my 10 or 20 or sometimes 40 minute a days just to write. Lately I've been wondering about the word processors I used to think about what worked and what didn't work for me.
When I want to enhance what I've done with my Google Docs Writing Tracker, I need a place to get started, and given the utilities I've used in the past, it seemed like a good place. Can' t help but notice that Word for 5.5 is the best word processing program I have ever used.
There' s a certain distinction between the contents level and the display level. World for DOS is not YSIWYG and that means less distractions when trying to properly reformat the work. So I could concentrate on the contents. It is important to spend a lot of patience on the contents and not on formating, especially when you consider that many publishers generally agree to submit in the same default script size.
It was easy to use. Whilst Word had a great deal of feature to provide for Doc-O-Matic Office, they were concealed behind the menus. There was no need to waste my free moment concealing things I would never use. I used the Word for Doc-O-Macrosystem very well back in the university.
I' d be a liar if I didn't recognize that some of the good emotions I have about Word for Docs come from the old days when I used it. I' been to school. I also used the word processing software when I chose to write tales for submissions.
As horrible as they were, the very first few tales I ever told were in Word for 5.5 or later. Most of the files I have created in Microsoft Word for Microsoft Office 5.5 are still in my possession. Recently I found that Word for Microsoft 5.5.0 was published for free by Microsoft when it did the Y2K patch in 1999.
After looking through my storyline with the word processors - which, the main utility I used in my writing --, I think it is important to comprehend my processes and what it means to write a storyline or an essay from beginning to end. The identification of the stages in this will help us find more places where we can use the right set of utilities to help us automatize some of the more routinely part of writing.
To me, automating is an important part of the writing experience when for no other reasons allows me to regain writing practice rather than devote it to repetitive exercises that assist writing but do not include the actual act of writing itself.