Best word Processor for novel WritingThe best word processor for innovative writing
Writing a novel -- that's not Word
While Microsoft Word is the 800-pound chorilla among word processing programs, that doesn't necessarily make it the best. It' sluggish, inflated and costly and doesn't have many advanced functions like auto save, versions of documents and iCloud. Plus, if you do any kind of long writing with multiple sections, it has no organisation system - so good fortune that keeps all your tales just as you write the great American novel.
The Nisus Writer Pro is a good starting point if you want to switch to a more user-friendly word processor. The Nisus is highly customisable, so you can remove all the functions you don't need and type with fewer diversions. There is also a documentmanager, so you can have several dokuments in one single dokuments instead of one huge dokuments or one million smalldokuments.
Work with iCloud and save your work so you don't have to press Command-S every five seconds. In addition, it has versioned documents so that you can see what your documents were like at different points in the process and, if necessary, have access to an older one. Nisus stores everything in RTF so you can open your file on almost any computer.
The Nisus Writer Pro usually cost $79, but you can get it now for half for only $39.
Writing better starts with the right tooling
There is a hypothesis that writing instruments are as powerful for authors as the selection of a particular type of writing instrument or area. The historian Lon Shelby has written in detail about the construction practice of the mediaeval bricklayers behind the emergence of churches such as Chartres, iconical structures that owed their emergence and construction to the special instruments used for surveying and design.
"Until the story of their instruments is sufficiently described," wrote Shelby, "the performance of the mediaeval bricklayers cannot be correctly evaluated from a technical point of view. t. It' s not difficult to get authors to draw virtuous hearts by asking them to explain the comparative benefits of Ulysses and Bear, Markdown and Richard Text or Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs.
There are few experts, from graduates and undergraduates to business blogs and analyst, who do not at least waste part of their working hours formulating the paragraph. Of course, it is not only the keypad that characterizes our fiction; the much more powerful is the programming we use. That' s why it is worth thinking about what we expect from our writing instruments: not just as single authors and comicators, but as reader and people involved in the further development of our writing arsenal.
I am very concerned about the influence of our writing environments because my writing processes have just been changed by Scrivener, a writing tool I bought a few years ago, but I've only just started using it. I' m a little much of a sophomore, so there's nothing out of the ordinary about trying out a new capp as part of my never-ending search for perfect production or going back to an cache I've been tinkering with to use for a more engaging shoot.
I' m a regular user of new e-mail client, taskmanager, notepad application, file analyzer and imager. To find out about the possible effects of a specially developed writing instrument, simply look back a few years on the origins of word processing. The writing of music is more important and private than anything else, because writing is thought.
The way we organize the writing processes not only determines how we express our own thoughts in the global arena, but also how we ourselves work with these thoughts. We do this work in a truly digitally -driven setting that may be critical to those of us who make a livelihood out of our writing, but that should be important to anyone who writes a lot for work or work.
When you' ve been using the same writing tool as me for years, it's simple not to think about the influence your writing utilities have on your daily work. Over the last ten years, almost all my forms have been written in Evernote, and for twenty-five years all my forms have been written in Microsoft Word.
I don't give up either of these but writing the last few months in Scrivener has reminds me that new features allow new thoughts and new ways of working. Scrivener makes it so simple to cut and reorganise parts of a file, it fundamentally changes the writing and reviewing processes and the equilibrium between them.
Scrivener' s most useful functions are summarised in Stergios Botzakis' paper on student writing instruments: The student can use the folder that serves as the index of the projects to write chapter and scene within them. The" gee whiz" joy I felt in my relationship with Scrivener can be clearly felt in these early word processings.
Though Matthew Kirchenbaum has published an unabridged volume on the effects of word processors, its seed appears in his paper on how it changed John Updike's work: "Like many others,[Updike] was initially fascinated by the odd new machine and explained it more than once as "dazzling". The proof that authors test their first word processor is a small category in their own work.
The best-known example comes from Russell Banks when he was writing the novel that became Affliction: Meanwhile, Stephen King has written a brief storyline, "The Word Processor", which was released in Playboy and is considered the first advanced fictitious handling of the game. I' ve seen different ways in which the computer has influenced my students' advancement.
First, the computer seemed to help alleviate students' writing disabilities. At the beginning of the term (in early diary entries) writing about nervousness in writing did not show any fear during the course of the course. As an example, a pupil who could not even think of an ideas for a diary post on the second teaching days flourished when he started writing on the computer.
One other pupil said that he liked writing on the computer because he had forgotten to think about what he said. However, despite all the sentimental pleasure and freedom of word processor, the question arose as to whether it actually resulted in better writing. The reason why word processors have disappointed the world's composing instructors a little is that they have made crafting easier while doing little to promote the kind of large-scale editorial and re-thinking that a little work can really bring forward.
Richard M. Collier stated in an 1983 paper that the use of a word processor for revision has not improved the overall standard of their work. The word processor complain is exactly what sent me looking for a new writing experience. I' m no unknown when it comes to making large format adaptations in Word; there were many large pictures that were rearranged when writing my Ph. D. thesis and later when writing my eBook collection.
It was a rather difficult task because Word (like most word processing programs and text editors) is arranged as if the entire story (or paper, or review, or book) is the basic ontology. In principle, Word is a utility that facilitates the moderate changes described by Collier. Scrivener on the other side aims to make what Dave and Russell call a "global revision" easier.
In order to use Scrivener to create this item, I had to import each of the above quotations as a single document so that I could move them in and reorder them as I pleased. Scrivener has many followers among writers, scriptwriters, academic writers, scriptwriters and even some blogs, but it is still far from overhauling word processing programs like Word and Google Docs as the everyday environment in which most commercial and private writing takes place.
While this inevitably restricts the short-term effects on our literature or journalism cultures, do not overlook the effects they could have in the long run. Scrivener is just one of many utilities that help the writing processes in a new way. Consider the blogs platforms media, which has developed its read and write communities around the clear, dependable interfaces it provides to authors.
An increasing number of my essays start their lives in medium because the minimum formats focus on writing. If you' re attracted by bell and whistle like fonts or bold, there is the Markdown Editor cult: writing tools where you format through a hidden word list of icons like **asterisks** (if you want bold) or _underscores_ (to underline).
Consider that selecting the right tooling is only the first part of the work. There are also the long writing utilities, which help you to understand that the work in long format goes beyond the filesize. There is Novlr, where your novel is completely in the clouds; Final Draft, developed for scriptwriters; and Ultrasses, which works for any author as long as he uses a Mac.
All of them are explicitly created around the writing processes, although they are as different from each other as the authors. All of these apps have one thing in common that you lack in your simple, universal word processor. It is the view that comes from the influence of word processing on our writing in the last thirty years or, as far as that is concerned, from the viewpoint of the influence of compass on mediaeval bricklayers.
We need our instruments. However, if you are actually trying to improve your writing practices or crafts, select the right writing instrument (or tools!) to overcome your greatest restrictions.