Authoring a Book

Writing a book

The editors have many years of experience in technical editing and writing. I'm the lead author on this project; they're my clients.

Getting it right

This common work load gives a feeling of common responsibility, the capacity to ridicule or shake off some of the unavoidable issues. However, it doesn't always run without a hitch, and only as a co-author of a book does one realize what one should have said before the start. If you have a few preliminary unanswered question, it will be a great benefit for both of you.

You and your partners must have a good motivation to participate in a common venture. If it' s about cash, I like to work on 50:50 shared profit sharing schemes, but this will differ from scheme to scheme. I learned here from many years of cooperation.

Anyone who is in charge of the maintenance of the contents or do you consent to their forfeiture? Do I know that writers who find their style of composition very different and which of you has the right or the power to make definitive edit? Any clumsiness can be avoided by arranging your suggested role models for the co-authors of a book right at the beginning.

These are the three ways I have found to be most able to work when it comes to typing a co-authored, collective book: At times, the easiest way is to divide and distinguish between them. Give free reign to each co-author with his or her own sections. Commemorate your disagreements, even call the playwright like in an Anthologie.

Of course, you can annotate each other's work, but you can't take your vote out of your work, you can't try to make the letter ring the same, give (and accept) positive answers to positive and negative comments, but you can't enforce common drafting judgments. Prosperous Coach is a good example of a book like this.

Writers have a good pace, they take up different facets of the subject and there seems to be no overlapping or divergences in the contents. Both of you have the creativity to create your best work and bring your own idea to the projects without diluting it for others.

Disadvantages: You may find some overlapping in the contents, or that you follow different anecdotes. Take some veneer work. Get an idea together and then let each writer tell you what he wants to say. Arrange a procedure for easy commentary on the respective chapter - and a remedy if it turns out that your approach is very different.

With each of these models, one individual assumes full accountability. For example, one of you could design the first complete design while the first writer returns to the design to make definitive editing, enhancements, or changes. That works well if you have a similar outlook, but one of you will prefer to type or have more writing experience, and the second writer is satisfied to let that individual guide the sense of the book.

It is important that you both work together on this process and appreciate each other's inputs, even if it seems like giving more of their own free or professional knowledge. Your win-win situation is your main basis or cooperation will eventually founder. I have done this through education, working with someone with more knowledge than me, and contributing my abilities and experiences in creating, teaching and promoting music.

Disadvantages: A individual may experience as if they are doing more of the work and this can result in an uneven one. Engage in an open and frank debate and be particularly aware of whether your employee and co-author has the feeling that he or she is getting everything he or she expects from the work.

But one of my common goal criterions is that the whole thing is more valuable than the total of parts, so for a 50:50 splitting of efforts, I think we get a 60:60 reward ratio.

Put in simple terms, it is (each of you) more worthwhile to do the whole thing together than to do it alone. And the third and last way (and my least favorite, if I must be honest) is to make it a real cooperation and to make an equal (more or less) contribution to all phases and all parts of the game.

It may appear to be the fairer approach - both in the work and the rewards - and it is very likely that the book will be seemless from the reader's point of view. On some occasions I think it affects the book because of the unavoidable compromise and compromise you make along the way.

The collaboration results in a smooth, fully-fledged financial statement book. It is as if they had the know-how of two writers and the vote of one. Disadvantages: Writing the book can take longer because you copy a procedure that can just as simply be done - or at least managed - by one of you.

Also, there is a risk that too many compromise have been made, so the ultimate contents can look as if they have been softened. Understand that you do not have to match everything and that your disagreements are part of the pleasure and forte.

Set a timeout for comments and the number of laps you will go back and forth. Agreed that there may be phases of the letter or certain issues where you think more could be done, but in the interest of completeness, you accept that your co-author has the last word.

Do you have any further queries? Now it' s the right moment to release and there are some last few issues you need to discuss with your co-author. Have you agreed on a cooperation that wasn't 50/50? Maybe this is a series cooperation and you need to think about what you should do for this book and upcoming one?

These are all good issues to ask yourself at the beginning, but if you put yourself more deeply into the whole procedure and have not yet decided how the loan will be divided, then you will not become insignificant when it comes to small things. Write your name in alphabetical order and keep in mind that you have the whole intro to discuss why you have written the book and who brings what to the page.

If you' re not James Patterson, it's unlikely that the money's in the book. There are two writers I know who have worked on a brief set of works and they alternately release them in their own works and keep the emoluments for the works they do. For me it' s great to work with the right people on the right projects.

Co-Authoring a work, if you decide to join one, can present you with new thoughts, it can present your work to a new public, and it can be a way to bring more value to your current group. Simply make sure you think it through, set up your own style and possess your own set of assets before you immerse yourself as soon as the first wave of excitement sets in.

Mehr zum Thema